Saturday, September 28, 2019

Does Goldman have a strategy?


The WSJ (Sept. 2019) reports the trouble Goldman Sachs is having adding consumer banking to its previous core businesses of trading and deal making. Questions arise.

  1. To what did GS say"NO" previously?
  2. To what does GS say "NO" now?
  3. Are the activities on which to focus for trading and deal making the same activities on which to focus for consumer banking?

Friday, September 20, 2019

The Secret Life of Regional Airlines

The Secret Life of Regional Airlines

By Jon Sindreu | September 12, 2019
Summary: Although the airline industry is dominated by a relatively small number of large firms, such as Delta Air Lines and American Airlines, 65 little-known regional carriers account for 40 percent of all passengers. Recently, some of the smaller airlines have been acquired by larger airlines, which have increasingly taken over small-jet fleets that they lease to their regional partners. One result of this is that more passengers are being shifted to the preferred hubs of the large airlines and away from smaller airports.
Classroom Application: The airline industry has an oligopoly market structure in which a relatively small number of firms account for a relatively large share of passenger ticket sales. Unlike a competitive market in which many firms have little or no power to set the prices of the products they sell, each oligopolist has enough power to increase or decrease its own prices. But other firms in the industry are likely to react to such price changes. As a result, there may be price competition in some oligopoly markets, but little in others where firms fear the impact a price war would have on their revenue and profits.
Questions:
  • Oligopoly markets have entry barriers that make it difficult, but not impossible, for new firms to enter the market to compete with existing firms. Name an entry barrier that would make it difficult for a new firm to enter the airline industry.
  • The article mentions that the airline industry was subject to government regulation prior to 1978. This regulation limited the prices airlines charged for passenger tickets. How can airlines compete with each other when price competition is limited by regulation?
  • Since 1978, an airline has been able to charge different prices than another airline that flies the same route. On what type of route would price competition be most likely? On what type of route would price competition be less likely?
  • A typical airline flight has relatively high fixed costs and very low marginal costs. Explain why the fixed cost of a flight from New York City to San Francisco is high. Explain why the marginal cost of this flight is low.
  • The article mentioned that a regional carrier, Mesa Airlines, “…returned to the stock market last year following a 2010 bankruptcy.” How would declaring bankruptcy assist Mesa Airlines’ return to the stock market?
  • From the article: “Mesa [Airlines] stock trades at 4.3 times earnings, less than half the average of the industry.” What does trading “at 4.3 times earnings” mean?
  • Would investors be more or less likely to purchase shares of Mesa stock because it trades at “less than half of the average of the industry”? Explain briefly.
  • “Economists have long found that market power tends to reside in the party that controls capital expenditure…” To what type of capital expenditure does this refer?
  • The article mentions that many planes that have 50 seats are becoming older and suggests that United and other major airlines would like to replace these with larger planes that have as many as 90 seats. Why would the airlines prefer to fly planes with more seats? Why would airline workers’ unions be reluctant to agree with this proposal?
  • “Both SkyWest’s and Mesa’s operating profit margins now surpass those of all major U.S. airlines…” How were two small, regional airlines able to have profit margins greater than the operating margins of each of the larger airlines?

Tuesday, September 17, 2019

Planet Money talks about "doing good"


This excerpt from a Planet Money newsletter (Sept. 2019) describes two studies that examine the impact of and reasons for corporations acting in socially responsibly ways.  
Two key findings are:

  1. "[W]hen a company says it's dedicated to helping disadvantaged children, they can pay much less and get much more."
  2. "[C]orporations use their charitable giving in politically strategic ways, giving more money to influential congressional districts when it suits their purposes. [The authors] call it 'tax-exempt lobbying.'"

John List, a coauther of one of the papers, offers three conclusions.

  1. "[R]easons [exist] to be cynical about corporate social responsibility." 
  2. "[Y]es, [the] research shows that 'people generally want to do good.' 
  3. [T]his includes those corporate executives who signed that statement saying their companies are about more than just profits." 
  4. "[T]he real reason for their recent statement, like other efforts to paint themselves as a force for social good, comes down to dollars and cents."

Monday, September 16, 2019

What Changed?


This WSJ article (Sept. 2019) reports that Boeing has changed its organizational chart in response to the crashes of its 737 MAX. Here are my questions.

  1. Did the change move decision rights?
  2. Did the change affect information flows?
  3. Did the change affect incentives?
  4. Did the change affect the extent to which the company is centralized?
  5. Did the change alter the extent to which the firm is organized around functions or products?

Sunday, September 15, 2019

Students offer $100 to other students to drop classes


This article in the Daily Californian reports that students on a wait list for a course have offered $100 to registered students to withdraw. Question: would accepting the offer move resources from low-value uses to high-value uses?

Friday, September 13, 2019

LSE swats away $37 billion


Market watch reports (Sept, 2019) that the London Stock Exchange swats away $37 billion Hong Kong offer. I have several questions.

  1. Who decided to sway away the offer?
  2. Do the deciders benefit when they swat away the offer?
  3. Do the shareholders benefit when the deciders swat away the offer valued at $37 billion when the company's current value is $31.4 billion?
    1. Does your answer depend on the costs the firm incurs to accept the offer and the probability regulatory agencies stop it?
    2. Does your answer depend on probability that the offer spurs additional offers for other suitors?
  4. What is the best way to measure the value of the HKEX stock that makes up 3/4 of the offer: the price buyers and sellers strike in open competition or the opinion of the deciders.  

Wednesday, September 11, 2019

Expensive popcorn in movie theaters = indirect price discrimination.


This article from the Hustle (Sept. 2019) describes pricing in movie theaters. Some key points.

  1. The commission theaters must pay on revenues from ticket sales reduces the incentive to increase the price of a ticket.
  2. "This strategy of selling a primary good at cost (or at a loss) and making the bulk of profit on a complementary good (like popcorn) is a form of the widely employed razor and blades business model. Microsoft, for instance, will sell its Xbox consoles at a steep loss to get people to buy them, then make healthy returns on games and accessories."
  3. "Gil, along with a colleague from Stanford, analyzed 5 years’ worth of revenue data from a major movie chain and found a different motivation for expensive popcorn: Theaters use it as a way to price discriminate, or charge customers varying prices for the same experience (in this case, seeing a movie)."

Friday, September 6, 2019

When Netflix sharpened its strategy

This account in the WSJ (Sept. 2019) describes when Amazon almost acquired Netflix. The result is that Netflix said no to selling DVDs.