A blog for graduate business students taking ECON 610 or similar courses at VCU. The opinions here are mine. No one at VCU reviews or approves what I post.
Wednesday, January 29, 2020
How do All-You-Can Eat Buffets Minimize Moral Hazard?
Thursday, January 16, 2020
Does Occupational Licensing Improve Quality?
Wednesday, January 8, 2020
Incentives for Public School Teachers in the D.C.
Some of the comments fear that cheating by teachers may account for some of the increase in measured performance.
Labels:
Aligning Interests,
Employment,
Moral Hazard
Tuesday, January 7, 2020
Can the Fed write better?
Which statement is written better?
"This action supports the Committee’s view that sustained expansion of economic activity, strong labor market conditions, and inflation near the Committee’s symmetric 2 percent objective are the most likely outcomes, but uncertainties about this outlook remain,”
or
“The Committee weighed arguments for and against cutting interest rates, considering the state of the economy, labor markets and inflation. The majority found the arguments favoring a 25-basis-point cut today more persuasive. But the Committee sees no case for further rate cuts unless the economy weakens or inflation starts to fall. Absent either such change, we expect to hold interest rates steady in the near future. The future is always uncertain, however, so we stand ready to reconsider this decision should circumstances warrant.”
https://www.wsj.com/articles/the-fed-should-speak-english-for-a-change-11578355141?mod=opinion_lead_pos10
"This action supports the Committee’s view that sustained expansion of economic activity, strong labor market conditions, and inflation near the Committee’s symmetric 2 percent objective are the most likely outcomes, but uncertainties about this outlook remain,”
or
“The Committee weighed arguments for and against cutting interest rates, considering the state of the economy, labor markets and inflation. The majority found the arguments favoring a 25-basis-point cut today more persuasive. But the Committee sees no case for further rate cuts unless the economy weakens or inflation starts to fall. Absent either such change, we expect to hold interest rates steady in the near future. The future is always uncertain, however, so we stand ready to reconsider this decision should circumstances warrant.”
https://www.wsj.com/articles/the-fed-should-speak-english-for-a-change-11578355141?mod=opinion_lead_pos10
Thursday, January 2, 2020
Mattel Commits the Fixed-Cost Fallacy
Mattel increased price for products produced at a plant when transferring one product at the plant increased the average fixed cost for the products that remained (WSJ, Jan. 2020).
Wednesday, January 1, 2020
Is AI better than Professional Judgment?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)